OK.
Jason
Ping.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 06:55:51PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> I noticed that C++14 [basic.types] says that "a type is a literal type
> if it is: void, [...]". Yet our literal_type_p doesn't consider void
> type as a literal type. The following is an attempt to fix that along
> with a te
I noticed that C++14 [basic.types] says that "a type is a literal type
if it is: void, [...]". Yet our literal_type_p doesn't consider void
type as a literal type. The following is an attempt to fix that along
with a testcase. It seems that void was only added in C++14, so check
for cxx14 as wel
