On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 12/31/19 6:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > My PR90677 fix actually made building older GCCs with newer ones worse.
> > The problem is that identifier_global_value used earlier returned either the
> > type decl on success or
On 12/31/19 6:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
My PR90677 fix actually made building older GCCs with newer ones worse.
The problem is that identifier_global_value used earlier returned either the
type decl on success or NULL_TREE on failure and the caller in that case
just defers handling it
Hi!
My PR90677 fix actually made building older GCCs with newer ones worse.
The problem is that identifier_global_value used earlier returned either the
type decl on success or NULL_TREE on failure and the caller in that case
just defers handling it until later, and that is also what the C