Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-27 Thread Jason Merrill
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 27 May 2016 at 17:46, Jason Merrill wrote: >> OK, thanks. > Should this fix be backported to the gcc6-branch? I have no plans to > backport it any further than that. No, the bug isn't

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-27 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 27 May 2016 at 17:46, Jason Merrill wrote: > OK, thanks. Should this fix be backported to the gcc6-branch? I have no plans to backport it any further than that. > > Jason > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Ville Voutilainen > wrote: >> On

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-27 Thread Jason Merrill
OK, thanks. Jason On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 20 May 2016 at 07:05, Ville Voutilainen > wrote: >> On 19 May 2016 at 19:40, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> Any thoughts on doing something

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-27 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 20 May 2016 at 07:05, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 19 May 2016 at 19:40, Jason Merrill wrote: >> Any thoughts on doing something similar for extern variable declarations? > > Ah, we diagnose local extern variable declarations that clash with >

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-19 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 19 May 2016 at 19:40, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 05/05/2016 09:11 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> >> On 5 May 2016 at 13:36, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> >>> .. minor nit: the new testcase has a number of trailing blank lines. >> >> >> New patch

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-19 Thread Jason Merrill
On 05/05/2016 09:11 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On 5 May 2016 at 13:36, Paolo Carlini wrote: .. minor nit: the new testcase has a number of trailing blank lines. New patch attached. :) Sorry for the delay. Please use ".diff" for patches so that they are properly

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-05 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 5 May 2016 at 13:36, Paolo Carlini wrote: > .. minor nit: the new testcase has a number of trailing blank lines. New patch attached. :) 69855.diff5 Description: Binary data

Re: [C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-05 Thread Paolo Carlini
.. minor nit: the new testcase has a number of trailing blank lines. Paolo.

[C++ PATCH] PR c++/69855

2016-05-04 Thread Ville Voutilainen
Tested on Linux-PPC64. Comments very much welcomed on the change to g++.old-deja/g++.pt/crash3.C, I'm not at all sure what that test is trying to do; it looks like it may have never cared about the names of the local functions, but rather about the fact that the function bodies of the member