On 08/19/2014 08:18 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- /*non_constant_p=*/dummy);
+ dummy);
Why remove the comment?
The rest of the patch is OK.
Jason
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 08:03 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/19/2014 08:18 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
- /*non_constant_p=*/dummy);
+ dummy);
Why remove the comment?
Oh well, the rationale was that normally we use that sort of comment
only to explain integer
Hi,
On 08/19/2014 02:18 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
two more functions. Tested x86_64-linux.
I'm pinging this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01853.html
Frankly, the cp_parser_constant_expression bits seem rather
straightforward to me. As regards the
Hi,
two more functions. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2014-08-19 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* parser.c (cp_parser_assignment_expression,
cp_parser_constant_expression): Add default arguments.
(cp_parser_primary_expression,
