On 8/2/19 8:27 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 14:02 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 31/07/19 21:39, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
I don't care for "cp_expr_loc_or_loc".
By "_or_here" do you mean "or input_location"?
Calling it "cp_expr_loc_or_input_location" would spell out
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 14:02 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31/07/19 21:39, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > I don't care for "cp_expr_loc_or_loc".
> >
> > By "_or_here" do you mean "or input_location"?
> >
> > Calling it "cp_expr_loc_or_input_location" would spell out what it
> > d
Hi,
On 31/07/19 21:39, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
I don't care for "cp_expr_loc_or_loc".
By "_or_here" do you mean "or input_location"?
Calling it "cp_expr_loc_or_input_location" would spell out what it
does, but would be rather long.
Thanks for your feedback. At this point I don't feel ve
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 15:14 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 7/24/19 5:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > this takes care of the four locations, two warnings and two errors.
> > I'm
> > also adding the missing complain & tf_warning or tf_error guards,
> > I
> > don't have a SFINAE testcase failing b
On 7/24/19 5:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this takes care of the four locations, two warnings and two errors. I'm
also adding the missing complain & tf_warning or tf_error guards, I
don't have a SFINAE testcase failing but since the function takes a
tsubst_flags_t argument I think it's the right
Hi,
this takes care of the four locations, two warnings and two errors. I'm
also adding the missing complain & tf_warning or tf_error guards, I
don't have a SFINAE testcase failing but since the function takes a
tsubst_flags_t argument I think it's the right thing to do. Tested
x86_64-linux.
