On 04/25/2012 01:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Perhaps we aren't checking default arguments unless they're actually
used; a could change that if they aren't dependent.
Your reply reached the mailing list a bit mangled, could you please
clarify?
If
Hi,
I'm trying to resolve this rather old PR, where we don't reject uses of
the dot operator in default template arguments, eg:
class blah { int member; };
blah global;
templateint param = global.member
class template_blah;
I'm enforcing the check by adding to cp_parser a new
Hi,
We should already reject that because it isn't a constant expression;
I don't think we want to bother checking specifically for this case in
the parser as well.
Sure we reject this kind of code at instantiation time. I suspect
submitter bothered filing a PR because other front-end also
On 04/24/2012 05:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Perhaps we aren't checking default arguments unless they're actually
used; a could change that if they aren't dependent.
Your reply reached the mailing list a bit mangled, could you please
clarify?
If the default argument isn't dependent on other
On 04/25/2012 01:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/24/2012 05:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Perhaps we aren't checking default arguments unless they're actually
used; a could change that if they aren't dependent.
Your reply reached the mailing list a bit mangled, could you please
clarify?
If
