Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51494 (and 52183)

2012-02-14 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, This patch fixes this particular bug, but there are some issues. First, non_static_member_function_p only checks the first function in the overload set, which may not be representative of all of them. It really shouldn't look through OVERLOADs, we need to defer this decision until

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51494 (and 52183)

2012-02-13 Thread Jason Merrill
This patch fixes this particular bug, but there are some issues. First, non_static_member_function_p only checks the first function in the overload set, which may not be representative of all of them. It really shouldn't look through OVERLOADs, we need to defer this decision until

[C++ Patch] PR 51494 (and 52183)

2012-02-09 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, a related/duplicate issue went into Bugzilla today, thus I decided to return to the RFC/Patch which I posted back in December (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01593.html): as far as I can see my analysis still stands and, to be clear, I'm proposing this kind of patch for