On 05/03/2012 04:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK. Seems safe enough for 4.7.1.
Applied, thanks!
Paolo.
OK. Seems safe enough for 4.7.1.
Jason
On 05/03/2012 03:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
What if we moved all the devirtualization logic from
build_new_method_call_1 to build_over_call?
Doh, you are absolutely right, the below, very simple, appears to work
well. Probably I was afraid that we could have issues with the other
build_over_ca
What if we moved all the devirtualization logic from
build_new_method_call_1 to build_over_call?
Jason
On 05/03/2012 03:27 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
Vincenzo reported today that the work done by Roberto on
devirtualizing final methods, doesn't cover operators (of all sorts).
Thus I prepared the below, which passes the testsuite on x86_64-linux.
... I have an alternate proposal, which probabl
Hi,
Vincenzo reported today that the work done by Roberto on devirtualizing
final methods, doesn't cover operators (of all sorts). Thus I prepared
the below, which passes the testsuite on x86_64-linux.
Is it Ok?
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
/cp
2012-05-03 Paolo Carlini
