Re: [C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-03-01 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 02/28/2014 04:50 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: OK, thanks. Applied. I have just noticed (sorry) that get_AT_ref (thus get_AT) isn't trivial at all, thus I propose to apply the below. Is it Ok with you? Thanks, Paolo. // 2014-03-01 Paolo Carlini

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-03-01 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. Jason

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-02-28 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 02/27/2014 08:29 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 02/25/2014 05:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: here we ICE exactly as we did in c++/53756: the only difference is the use of decltype(auto) instead of auto. Now, if we compare is_cxx_auto to is_auto (the front-end helper), evidently there is an

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-02-28 Thread Jason Merrill
OK, thanks. Jason

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-02-27 Thread Jason Merrill
On 02/25/2014 05:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: here we ICE exactly as we did in c++/53756: the only difference is the use of decltype(auto) instead of auto. Now, if we compare is_cxx_auto to is_auto (the front-end helper), evidently there is an inconsistency about the handling of decltype(auto)

[C++ Patch] PR 60314 (ICE with decltype(auto))

2014-02-25 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, here we ICE exactly as we did in c++/53756: the only difference is the use of decltype(auto) instead of auto. Now, if we compare is_cxx_auto to is_auto (the front-end helper), evidently there is an inconsistency about the handling of decltype(auto) and the below fixes the ICE. However,