Re: [C PATCH] Fix up composite_types (PR c/70280)

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Zdenek reported a compare debug issue, where it is dumping used function > prototypes and there is a difference between -g0 and -g in > -2: static int BIO_vsnprintf (char *, size_t, const char *, struct *, > void, ...); > +2: static int

[C PATCH] Fix up composite_types (PR c/70280)

Hi! Zdenek reported a compare debug issue, where it is dumping used function prototypes and there is a difference between -g0 and -g in -2: static int BIO_vsnprintf (char *, size_t, const char *, struct *, void, ...); +2: static int BIO_vsnprintf (char *, size_t, const char *, struct *);