Update the test to potentially generate two SEXT.W instructions: one for
incoming function arg, other for function return.
But after commit 8eb9cdd14218
("expr: don't clear SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P flag for a promoted subreg")
the test is not supposed to generate either of them so fix the expected
assembler output which was errorneously introduced by commit above.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c (foo2): Change return to unsigned
int as that will potentially generate two SEXT.W instructions.
dg-final: Change to scan-assembler-not SEXT.W.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vine...@rivosinc.com>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c
index 007792466a51..3348d593813d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zba_zbs -mabi=lp64" } */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" } } */
-int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){
+unsigned int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){
int s = 0;
unsigned int x = 0;
for (;x<n;x +=delta)
@@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){
return s;
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\msext\M" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\msext\M" } } */
--
2.34.1
