The patch is ok.
David
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>>> Patch updated to add a wrapper early_inline function
>>>
>>> Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
>>> ==
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>> Patch updated to add a wrapper early_inline function
>>
>> Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
>> ===
>> --- gcc/auto-profile.c
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Patch updated to add a wrapper early_inline function
>
> Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
> ===
> --- gcc/auto-profile.c (revision 208726)
> +++ gcc/auto-profile.c (working copy)
> @@ -14
Patch updated to add a wrapper early_inline function
Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
===
--- gcc/auto-profile.c (revision 208726)
+++ gcc/auto-profile.c (working copy)
@@ -1449,8 +1449,6 @@ afdo_vpt_for_early_inline (stmt_set *promoted_stmt
I think the right way to fix this is to wrap the call to early_inliner
and check the TODO flags. See execute_function_todo:
if (flags & TODO_cleanup_cfg)
{
cleanup_tree_cfg ();
if (!(flags & TODO_update_ssa_any) && need_ssa_update_p (cfun))
flags |= TODO_update_ssa;
This patch calls update_ssa before compute_inline_paramters.
Bootstrapped and perf test on-going.
OK for google-4_8?
Thanks,
Dehao
Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
===
--- gcc/auto-profile.c (revision 208726)
+++ gcc/auto-profile.c (worki
