I am not aware of any problems with isl 0.12 and would be surprised if such
problems exist. Are you?
I'm not aware of them, too.
P.S: As Richard suggested, we may also want to forbid CLooG 0.17.
I've attached the patch, which adds the requirement for ClooG 0.18.1.
Is it fine for trunk?
--
On July 20, 2014 1:29:30 PM CEST, Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not aware of any problems with isl 0.12 and would be surprised
if such
problems exist. Are you?
I'm not aware of them, too.
P.S: As Richard suggested, we may also want to forbid CLooG 0.17.
I've attached the
I've attached the patch, which adds the requirement for isl 0.12.
Tobias, is it important to accept only 0.12.1, 0.12.2 and forbid 0.12?
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
2014-07-12 Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com
* configure.ac: Don't accept isl 0.11.
On 17/07/2014 16:11, Roman Gareev wrote:
I've attached the patch, which adds the requirement for isl 0.12.
Tobias, is it important to accept only 0.12.1, 0.12.2 and forbid 0.12?
I am not aware of any problems with isl 0.12 and would be surprised if
such problems exist. Are you?
The patch
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 15/07/2014 17:02, Roman Gareev wrote:
I'm seeing the error:
gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:31:25: warning: isl/val_gmp.h: No such
file
or directory
when building for aarch64.
isl/val_gmp.h is included in 0.12
On 16/07/2014 11:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 15/07/2014 17:02, Roman Gareev wrote:
I'm seeing the error:
gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:31:25: warning: isl/val_gmp.h: No such
file
or directory
when building for
Could you prepare such a patch?
Yes, I've started working on it.
I have a question about isl. Can we require that isl is always
compiled with GMP support?
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
On 16/07/2014 14:03, Roman Gareev wrote:
Could you prepare such a patch?
Yes, I've started working on it.
I have a question about isl. Can we require that isl is always
compiled with GMP support?
isl 0.12.2 is always compiled with GMP support. Only for the unreleased
isl-0.14 imath was
I'm seeing the error:
gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:31:25: warning: isl/val_gmp.h: No such file
or directory
when building for aarch64.
isl/val_gmp.h is included in 0.12 AFAICS so perhaps we should demand 0.12
instead of 0.11 ?
According to isl's ChangeLog, isl_val abstraction was
On 15/07/2014 17:02, Roman Gareev wrote:
I'm seeing the error:
gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:31:25: warning: isl/val_gmp.h: No such file
or directory
when building for aarch64.
isl/val_gmp.h is included in 0.12 AFAICS so perhaps we should demand 0.12
instead of 0.11 ?
According to isl's
On 05/07/14 21:20, Rainer Orth wrote:
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com writes:
It seems the patch1/patch2 files you attach have the Content-Type:
application/octet-stream. This makes it impossible to view them inline.
Could you send them
Sorry, I was going to fix this. Thank you very much!
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com writes:
It seems the patch1/patch2 files you attach have the Content-Type:
application/octet-stream. This makes it impossible to view them inline.
Could you send them as text files? Just calling them
Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com writes:
It seems the patch1/patch2 files you attach have the Content-Type:
application/octet-stream. This makes it impossible to view them inline.
Could you send them as text files? Just calling them patch1.patch or
patch1.txt should make this work.
Yes,
I'm pretty it's the following that causes bootstrap to fail for me:
2014-06-29 Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com
* Makefile.in:
Add the compilation of graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.o.
* common.opt:
Add new switch fgraphite-code-generator=[isl|cloog].
*
On 29/06/2014 19:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
I'm pretty it's the following that causes bootstrap to fail for me:
2014-06-29 Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com
* Makefile.in:
Add the compilation of graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.o.
* common.opt:
Add new switch
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Tobias Grosser wrote:
sorry for the breakage. This seems to be caused by forgotten include
guards. I attached a patch (not bootstrapped yet), that should fix the
issue. I will start a gcc (non-graphite) bootstrap to see if it works
and will commit it immediately after.
Please add a FIXME note in graphite_regenerate_ast_isl saying that
this is not yet a full implementation of the code generator with ISL
ASTs.
It would be useful to make the current graphite_regenerate_ast_isl
working by calling graphite_regenerate_ast_cloog and adding the fixme
note above saying
Thanks Sebastian for the review! It is good to see you again on the
mailing list!
On 23/06/2014 11:29, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Please add a FIXME note in graphite_regenerate_ast_isl saying that
this is not yet a full implementation of the code generator with ISL
ASTs.
It would be useful to make
Thank you for the review!
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
ChangeLog_entry1
Description: Binary data
ChangeLog_entry2
Description: Binary data
patch1
Description: Binary data
patch2
Description: Binary data
It seems the patch1/patch2 files you attach have the Content-Type:
application/octet-stream. This makes it impossible to view them inline.
Could you send them as text files? Just calling them patch1.patch or
patch1.txt should make this work.
Yes, sure.
diff --git
These patches add ISL AST generation to graphite, which can be chosen
by the fgraphite-code-generator=[isl|cloog] switch. The first patch
makes initial renaming of gloog and gloog_error to
graphite_regenerate_ast_cloog and graphite_regenerate_error,
respectively. The second one adds new files with
On 18/06/2014 21:00, Roman Gareev wrote:
These patches add ISL AST generation to graphite, which can be chosen
by the fgraphite-code-generator=[isl|cloog] switch. The first patch
makes initial renaming of gloog and gloog_error to
graphite_regenerate_ast_cloog and graphite_regenerate_error,
23 matches
Mail list logo