RE: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-10 Thread Tamar Christina
Thanks both! Cheers, Tamar > -Original Message- > From: Martin Liška > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 2:41 PM > To: Tamar Christina ; Jonathan Wakely > > Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; g...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org> > Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] C

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-10 Thread Martin Liška
searching for it on the website but couldn’t find anything. Thanks, Tamar -Original Message- From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Martin Liška Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:38 AM To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; g...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-10 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:34:54PM +, Tamar Christina wrote: > Hi All, > > We've been wondering since we no longer list authors in the changelog (at > least mklog doesn't generate it), > How do we handle multi author patches nowadays? > > Tried searching for it on the website but couldn’t

RE: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-10 Thread Tamar Christina
atches On Behalf Of Martin > Liška > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:38 AM > To: Jonathan Wakely > Cc: Jakub Jelinek ; g...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org> > Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes > > On 6/9/20 10:29 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-10 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/9/20 10:29 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: OK, here's a proper patch for the changes you liked, dropping the changes to the Error exception type. pytest contrib/gcc-changelog/test_email.py passes. OK for master? I like it and I've just pushed the patch to master. Martin

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-09 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 15:25, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 6/2/20 4:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:16, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> > >>> On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > I tend to this approach.

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/2/20 4:14 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:16, Martin Liška wrote: On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: I tend to this approach. Let me prepare a patch candidate for it. There's a patch for it. Can you please

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:16, Martin Liška wrote: > > > > On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > > I tend to this approach. Let me prepare a patch candidate for it. > > > > There's a patch for it. Can you please Jonathan take a look? > >

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/2/20 3:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:16, Martin Liška wrote: On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: I tend to this approach. Let me prepare a patch candidate for it. There's a patch for it. Can you please Jonathan take a look? Looks great, thanks! +

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 14:16, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > I tend to this approach. Let me prepare a patch candidate for it. > > There's a patch for it. Can you please Jonathan take a look? Looks great, thanks! +if name not in

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/2/20 1:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote: I tend to this approach. Let me prepare a patch candidate for it. There's a patch for it. Can you please Jonathan take a look? Thanks, Martin >From 4d2cf31b6deb03c9ddc8062b9a45d2511e4a58bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Liska Date: Tue, 2 Jun

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/2/20 1:22 PM, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: The libstdc++

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > The libstdc++ manual is written in Docbook XML,

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 12:05, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > The libstdc++ manual is written in Docbook XML, but we commit both the > > > XML and generated HTML pages to Git.

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 07:44, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 6/1/20 7:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:50, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> I've turned the strict mode of Martin Liška's hook changes, > >> which means that from now on no commits to

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > > The libstdc++ manual is written in Docbook XML, but we commit both the > > XML and generated HTML pages to Git. Sometimes a small XML file can > > result in dozens of mechanical

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > The libstdc++ manual is written in Docbook XML, but we commit both the > XML and generated HTML pages to Git. Sometimes a small XML file can > result in dozens of mechanical changes to the generated HTML files, > which we record in the

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-02 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/1/20 7:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:50, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: Hi! I've turned the strict mode of Martin Liška's hook changes, which means that from now on no commits to the trunk or release branches should be changing any ChangeLog files together with

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-06-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 23:50, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > Hi! > > I've turned the strict mode of Martin Liška's hook changes, > which means that from now on no commits to the trunk or release branches > should be changing any ChangeLog files together with the other files, > ChangeLog entry

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-05-26 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
Great, thanks! On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:08 PM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 5/26/20 7:22 AM, Hongtao Liu via Gcc wrote: > > i commit a separate patch alone only for ChangeLog files, should i revert > > it? > > Hello. > > I've just done it. > > Martin -- BR, Hongtao

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-05-26 Thread Martin Liška
On 5/26/20 7:22 AM, Hongtao Liu via Gcc wrote: i commit a separate patch alone only for ChangeLog files, should i revert it? Hello. I've just done it. Martin

Re: [IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-05-25 Thread Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 6:49 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi! > > I've turned the strict mode of Martin Liška's hook changes, > which means that from now on no commits to the trunk or release branches > should be changing any ChangeLog files together with the other files, >

[IMPORTANT] ChangeLog related changes

2020-05-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
Hi! I've turned the strict mode of Martin Liška's hook changes, which means that from now on no commits to the trunk or release branches should be changing any ChangeLog files together with the other files, ChangeLog entry should be solely in the commit message. The DATESTAMP bumping script will