Noticed while browsing the code. The add_losym_mode instruction takes
an immediate field as the third operand. Hence it's type is alu_imm,
not alu_reg.
Probably doesn't have any major effect on current pipeline models, but
could do one day...
Committed to trunk.
2014-07-14 Richard Earnshaw
On 14/07/14 15:34, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Noticed while browsing the code. The add_losym_mode instruction takes
an immediate field as the third operand. Hence it's type is alu_imm,
not alu_reg.
Probably doesn't have any major effect on current pipeline models, but
could do one day...
