If so is the backport OK for 4.8?
I am happy for it to go to 4.8 provided it's tested on 4.8 and the
release managers don't object.
Ramana
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
At 2013-04-30 18:45:42,Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi,
On 08/04/13 06:28, Xinyu Qi wrote:
At 2013-04-02 17:50:03,Ramana Radhakrishnan ramra...@arm.com
wrote:
On 04/02/13 10:40, Xinyu Qi wrote:
Hi,
According to Vladimir Makarov's analysis, the root
Hi,
On 08/04/13 06:28, Xinyu Qi wrote:
At 2013-04-02 17:50:03,Ramana Radhakrishnan ramra...@arm.com wrote:
On 04/02/13 10:40, Xinyu Qi wrote:
Hi,
According to Vladimir Makarov's analysis, the root cause of PR target/54338
is that ALL_REGS doesn't contain IWMMXT_GR_REGS in
ChangeLog
2013-04-02 Xinyu Qi x...@marvell.com
PR target/54338
* config/arm/arm.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Include IWMMXT_GR_REGS in
ALL_REGS.
Thanks,
Xinyu
Thanks now applied to trunk.
For the future please consider creating patches at the top level
directory. Makes it
Hi,
According to Vladimir Makarov's analysis, the root cause of PR target/54338
is that ALL_REGS doesn't contain IWMMXT_GR_REGS in REG_CLASS_CONTENTS.
It seems there is no reason to exclude the IWMMXT_GR_REGS from ALL_REGS as
IWMMXT_GR_REGS are the real registers.
This patch simply makes
On 04/02/13 10:40, Xinyu Qi wrote:
Hi,
According to Vladimir Makarov's analysis, the root cause of PR target/54338
is that ALL_REGS doesn't contain IWMMXT_GR_REGS in REG_CLASS_CONTENTS.
It seems there is no reason to exclude the IWMMXT_GR_REGS from ALL_REGS as
IWMMXT_GR_REGS are the real
