On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> On 25/03/14 15:44, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>> On 24/03/14 11:26, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch enables tail call optimization for long call on arm.
>>>
>>> Previously we have too strict check on arm_function_ok_for_sibcall and
>>> be
On 25/03/14 15:44, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 24/03/14 11:26, Jiong Wang wrote:
This patch enables tail call optimization for long call on arm.
Previously we have too strict check on arm_function_ok_for_sibcall and
be lack of the support on sibcall/sibcall_value expand that long call tail
opp
On 24 March 2014 11:26, Jiong Wang wrote:
> gcc/
> * config/arm/predicates.md (call_insn_operand): Add long_call check.
> * config/arm/arm.md (sibcall, sibcall_value): Force the address to reg for
> long_call.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (arm_function_ok_for_sibcall): Remove long_call
> re
On 24/03/14 11:26, Jiong Wang wrote:
> This patch enables tail call optimization for long call on arm.
>
> Previously we have too strict check on arm_function_ok_for_sibcall and
> be lack of the support on sibcall/sibcall_value expand that long call tail
> oppportunities are lost.
>
> OK for nex
>
>
> gcc/
> * config/arm/predicates.md (call_insn_operand): Add long_call check.
> * config/arm/arm.md (sibcall, sibcall_value): Force the address to reg for
> long_call.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (arm_function_ok_for_sibcall): Remove long_call
> restriction.
config/arm/arm.c :)
The ARM
This patch enables tail call optimization for long call on arm.
Previously we have too strict check on arm_function_ok_for_sibcall and
be lack of the support on sibcall/sibcall_value expand that long call tail
oppportunities are lost.
OK for next next stage 1?
thanks.
--
Jiong
gcc/
* conf
