Bernd Edlinger wrote:
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes end with [0-9]t.
This trick makes all names unique again.
One
Hi Tobias,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:50:24, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Bernd Edlinger wrote:
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
I thought about that, too. But it is likely that the pattern for array of
target class
__class_%s_%d_%d will eventually clash with the non-array target class
__class_%s
which proves that I am too sleep deprieved to
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you also fix the ChangeLog?
You used gcc/ChangeLog but the proper
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:15:16, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:54:52AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
No re-reading the orginal patch, I think it is okay. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00376.html
Thanks for the commit. However, can you
Sorry, wrong subject, again...
Hi,
this patch fixes a recently discovered name-clash in gfc_build_class_symbol.
Fortunately it is quite easy to fix: just make sure that the class names of
target
classes end with _t, and target array classes end with [0-9]t.
This trick makes all names
