On Fri, 20 May 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
By the way, I am quite happy of Pierre patches to the MELT branch. Is
this enough to get him a write access to GCC SVN (all legalese is done)?
I fear that to really get that write access, Pierre would also need to
have accepted patches to the
On Sun, 22 May 2011 15:24:30 +0200 (CEST)
Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
By the way, I am quite happy of Pierre patches to the MELT branch. Is
this enough to get him a write access to GCC SVN (all legalese is done)?
I fear that
I have corrected my patch with your remarks.
Especially about the debug functions, it takes the debug melt flag into
account. Moreover, I have allowed the user to give a message when
calling this function, as usual in MELT debug functions. Giving this
message was a bit difficult (This is the
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:47:57 +0200
Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com wrote:
I have corrected my patch with your remarks.
Especially about the debug functions, it takes the debug melt flag into
account. Moreover, I have allowed the user to give a message when
calling this function, as
On Wed, 18 May 2011 21:04:39 +0200
Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com wrote:
Hello,
I have written a patch to allow the use of the GCC dominance functions
into MELT.
[...]
Changelog:
2011-05-17 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt
