On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Ping. Re-bootstrapped and re-tested yesterday on x86_64-linux.
Ok. Does this also apply (maybe in modifed form) to the 4.6 branch?
Thanks,
Richard.
THanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Martin
Ping. Re-bootstrapped and re-tested yesterday on x86_64-linux.
THanks,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
pass_split_functions is happy to split functions which have type
attributes
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
pass_split_functions is happy to split functions which have type
attributes but cannot update them if the new clone has in any way
different parameters than the original. This can lead to
miscompilations in cases like the
Hi,
pass_split_functions is happy to split functions which have type
attributes but cannot update them if the new clone has in any way
different parameters than the original. This can lead to
miscompilations in cases like the testcase.
This patch solves it by 1) making the inliner set the
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
pass_split_functions is happy to split functions which have type
attributes but cannot update them if the new clone has in any way
different parameters than the original. This can lead to
miscompilations in cases like