Re: [PATCH, PR 57347] Do not create aggregate jump functions for bit-fields

2013-05-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > I have not intended aggregate jump functions to work with bit-fields > but apparently forgot to include the test to ignore them. PR 57347 > testcase gives a good example why they need to be avoided. If we ever > decide to optimize f

[PATCH, PR 57347] Do not create aggregate jump functions for bit-fields

2013-05-22 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, I have not intended aggregate jump functions to work with bit-fields but apparently forgot to include the test to ignore them. PR 57347 testcase gives a good example why they need to be avoided. If we ever decide to optimize for them too (and not just in IPA land), they should be lowered ear