From: Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:23:27 +0100
bootstrapped and reg-tested (ada inclusive) on x86_64.
Time to update your inspection script: there's a missing sanity
check for the number of passes. I suggest you re-run regtests
for the main change with the
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:32:36 +0100
Typos like this cause the test-run to be aborted for the current
.exp file,
In this case, some 3000 test-cases went missing, judging by the
gcc Summary output.
Correction: not just the .exp file but the whole
On 18/12/11 09:47, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:32:36 +0100
Typos like this cause the test-run to be aborted for the current
.exp file,
In this case, some 3000 test-cases went missing, judging by the
gcc Summary output.
On 12/15/2011 01:23 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
PR tree-optimization/51491
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (insert_clobber_before_stack_restore)
(gsi_prev_dom_bb_nondebug, insert_clobbers_for_var): New function.
(ccp_fold_stmt): Use insert_clobbers_for_var after a successful
On 13/12/11 14:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
2011-12-13 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
PR tree-optimization/51491
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (insert_clobber_before_stack_restore): New function.
(ccp_fold_stmt): Use
Jakub,
I have a patch for PR51491.
Consider the following test-case, compiled with gcc -O2 -S f.c -fdump-tree-all:
...
int f(void)
{
int tt = 0;
int t = 4;
{
int a[t];
tt = g(a);
tt += a[0];
}
{
int a[4];
tt += g(a);
tt += a[0];
}
return tt;
}
...
The vla
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:26:42PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
2011-12-13 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
PR tree-optimization/51491
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (insert_clobber_before_stack_restore): New function.
(ccp_fold_stmt): Use insert_clobber_before_stack_restore after a
