Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-09-19 Thread Tom de Vries
On 19/09/16 13:02, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: On 29/08/16 17:12, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 29/08/16 17:51, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: >> >>> This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict. > 2016-08-22 Tom de Vries

Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-09-19 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 29/08/16 17:12, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 29/08/16 17:51, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: >> >>> This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict. > 2016-08-22 Tom de Vries > > PR C/71602 > * builtins.c

Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-09-11 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 10 September 2016 at 00:04, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/29/2016 10:12 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: >> >> On 29/08/16 17:51, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict.

Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-09-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 08/29/2016 10:12 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: On 29/08/16 17:51, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, 6-branch? ENOPATCH Patch attached this

Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-08-29 Thread Tom de Vries
On 29/08/16 17:51, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict. Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. OK for trunk, 6-branch? ENOPATCH Patch attached this time. Thanks, - Tom Make

Re: [PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-08-29 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Tom de Vries wrote: > This patch fixes PR71602 by making canonical_va_list_type more strict. > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64. > > OK for trunk, 6-branch? ENOPATCH -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

[PATCH, PR71602, 4/4] Make canonical_va_list_type more strict

2016-08-24 Thread Tom de Vries
[ was: Re: [PATCH, PR71602] Give error for invalid va_list argument to va_arg ] On 23/06/16 23:21, Jason Merrill wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: Hi, this patch fixes PR71602, a 6/7 regression. Consider this test-case:>> The patch fixes