Re: [PATCH, c++ testsuite]: Fix UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda6.C testsuite failure

2016-08-11 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > There's no need to rename main, but removing the dg-do is OK. Thanks, I have committed only the removal of dg-do directive. Uros. Index: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda6.C

Re: [PATCH, c++ testsuite]: Fix UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda6.C testsuite failure

2016-08-11 Thread Jason Merrill
There's no need to rename main, but removing the dg-do is OK. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > The compilation, where error is expected, will not produce an executable. > > 2016-08-11 Uros Bizjak > > *

[PATCH, c++ testsuite]: Fix UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda6.C testsuite failure

2016-08-11 Thread Uros Bizjak
The compilation, where error is expected, will not produce an executable. 2016-08-11 Uros Bizjak * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda6.C (dg-do run): Remove. (g): Rename from main. Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? Uros. Index: