On 02/07/2016 10:58 AM, Michael Collison wrote:
Richard,
One other question on the patch. I note that when you expand the addv and uaddv
patterns you emit rtl using gen_add3_compareV and en_add3_compareC
respectively. These patterns use sign_extend and zero_extend respectively. Why
do you not
Richard,
One other question on the patch. I note that when you expand the addv
and uaddv patterns you emit rtl using gen_add3_compareV and
en_add3_compareC respectively. These patterns use sign_extend and
zero_extend respectively. Why do you not do the same thing for the subv
and usubv
On 01/28/2016 01:50 AM, Michael Collison wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Note that this patch appears to depend on your previous patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/txtDPaXOBMuOB.txt
>
> for the definition of define_mode_attr DWI. I was looking at this patch as I
> was working on
Hi Richard,
Note that this patch appears to depend on your previous patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/txtDPaXOBMuOB.txt
for the definition of define_mode_attr DWI. I was looking at this patch
as I was working on Bugzilla 68543 which this will address.
Regards,
Michael
After having just spent a few days looking through dumps of
builtin-overflow-*.c for regressions while testing the patch for the TImode
arithmetic PR, I thought I'd go ahead and post a patch to make use of the
overflow bit on aarch64.
Consider this queued for stage1.
r~
*
