On 10 Oct 21:20, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-10 20:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree operations
with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE
2014-10-10 20:45 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/09/14 10:54, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
operations with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree operations
with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
+ arg1, integer_minus_one_node));
+ op1 = force_reg (Pmode, op1);
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
It appeared I changed a semantics of BNDMK expand when replaced tree
operations with rtl ones.
Original code:
+ op1 = expand_normal (fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg1),
+
On 18 Sep 19:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your comments. Below is a fixed verison.
Ilya
--
OK with a few nits below.
Thanks,
Uros.
+
+case IX86_BUILTIN_BNDRET:
+ arg0 =
On 17 Sep 20:06, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like the way arguments are prepared. For the case above,
bnd_ldx should have index_register_operand predicate in its pattern,
and this predicate (and its mode)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your comments. Below is a fixed verison.
Ilya
--
2014-09-17 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
(ULONG): New.
On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
BND mode introduced.
Hi,
Here is a patch from the series that introduces modes and instructions:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
BND mode introduced.
Hi,
Here is a
On 17 Sep 11:42, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 16 Sep 12:02, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hm, can this patch be compiled as part of the series? The expanders
refer to various gen_bnd patterns that I don't see. Also, I don't see
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like the way arguments are prepared. For the case above,
bnd_ldx should have index_register_operand predicate in its pattern,
and this predicate (and its mode) should be checked in the expander
code.
2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
(ULONG): New.
(BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_ULONG): New.
(VOID_FTYPE_BND_PCVOID): New.
(VOID_FTYPE_PCVOID_PCVOID_BND): New.
(BND_FTYPE_PCVOID_PCVOID):
Ping
2014-06-11 17:58 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch adds i386 target builtins for Pointer Bounds Checker.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
*
Hi,
This patch adds i386 target builtins for Pointer Bounds Checker.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2014-06-11 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BND): New.
(ULONG): New.
15 matches
Mail list logo
