Hello!
This ICE was caused by a peephole2 pattern that allowed non-general
regs arguments.
2015-07-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/66814
* config/i386/predicates.md (nonimmediate_gr_operand): New predicate.
* config/i386/i386.md (not peephole2): Use
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:13:49PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I was under impression that peephole2 pass doesn't see subregs of hard
regs (all x86 predicates are written in this way). Even documentation
somehow agrees with this:
'(subreg:M1 REG:M2 BYTENUM)'
'subreg' expressions are
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:22:33PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
This ICE was caused by a peephole2 pattern that allowed non-general
regs arguments.
2015-07-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/66814
* config/i386/predicates.md (nonimmediate_gr_operand): New
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:22:33PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
This ICE was caused by a peephole2 pattern that allowed non-general
regs arguments.
2015-07-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/66814
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:13:49PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I was under impression that peephole2 pass doesn't see subregs of hard
regs (all x86 predicates are written in this way). Even documentation
somehow agrees with