On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:59:50PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
Please use VMX instead of AV, not because I am pedantic about
IBM's name for the feature, but AV is meaningless to me and anyone
else reading the code. If you need a three-letter name, use VMX.
Okay with that change.
I just
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:59:50PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
Please use VMX instead of AV, not because I am pedantic about
IBM's name for the feature, but AV is meaningless to me and anyone
else reading the code. If you need a three-letter name, use VMX.
Okay with that change.
I can
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:59:50PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
Please use VMX instead of AV, not because I am pedantic about
IBM's name for the feature, but AV is meaningless to me and anyone
else reading the
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On this patch, I add some infrastructure to say whether a given mode can go in
a general purpose register, floating point register, or altivec register, and
if it can, what kinds of addressing is legal for the
On this patch, I add some infrastructure to say whether a given mode can go in
a general purpose register, floating point register, or altivec register, and
if it can, what kinds of addressing is legal for the mode. In addition, I have
switched to using memset to setup the arrays indexed by mode.
