> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > #define rs6000_special_adjust_field_align_p(FIELD, COMPUTED) 0
> >
> > is what succeeds for me. false is not defined for ObjC. Checked in on the
> > trunk
> > and the branches.
>
> Since we didn't backport the actual ABI change to the branches, only the
> warning,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> #define rs6000_special_adjust_field_align_p(FIELD, COMPUTED) 0
>
> is what succeeds for me. false is not defined for ObjC. Checked in on the
> trunk
> and the branches.
Since we didn't backport the actual ABI change to the branches, only the
warning,
I think it would be
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 03:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> Blah, that won't work of course. The macro needs to take two
> >> parameters.
> >>
> >> #define rs6000_special_adjust_field_align_p(FIELD, COMPUTED) false
> >
> > This is pre-approved if it works. I really should finish off the
Am 27.07.2014 13:59, schrieb pins...@gmail.com:
>
>
>> On Jul 27, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:16:07PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 17.07.2014 02:41, schrieb Ulrich Weigand:
> He
> On Jul 27, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:16:07PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Am 17.07.2014 02:41, schrieb Ulrich Weigand:
Hello,
this is the variant intended for the 4.8/
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:16:07PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Am 17.07.2014 02:41, schrieb Ulrich Weigand:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > this is the variant intended for the 4.8/4.9 branches of the patch:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 01:45:12PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 17.07.2014 02:41, schrieb Ulrich Weigand:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is the variant intended for the 4.8/4.9 branches of the patch:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01072.html
> >
> > As discussed, it does *not* ac
Am 17.07.2014 02:41, schrieb Ulrich Weigand:
> Hello,
>
> this is the variant intended for the 4.8/4.9 branches of the patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01072.html
>
> As discussed, it does *not* actually change ABI, but only warn when
> encountering a situation where the ABI
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:01:21PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> This patch is okay with me if okay with the Release Managers.
Ok.
Jakub
This patch is okay with me if okay with the Release Managers.
Thanks, David
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the variant intended for the 4.8/4.9 branches of the patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01072.html
>
> As discussed, it does
Hello,
this is the variant intended for the 4.8/4.9 branches of the patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01072.html
As discussed, it does *not* actually change ABI, but only warn when
encountering a situation where the ABI will change in a future GCC.
(Avoiding the specific term "
11 matches
Mail list logo