On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 14:37 +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:14:31PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:36 +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:34:18PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 18:26 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:14:31PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:36 +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:34:18PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 18:26 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Bill Schmidt
On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:36 +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:34:18PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 18:26 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:23 +0800,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:34:18PM +0100, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 18:26 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:23 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Bill
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:23 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 18:26 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:23 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Index:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a follow-up to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00103.html, which adds
support for faster unaligned vector memory accesses on POWER8. As
pointed out in
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:23 +0800, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c
Hi,
David correctly pointed out offline that I used the wrong macro to test
for efficient unaligned access. Here's a corrected version, which still
fixes PR65456 without causing regressions. Sorry for the error!
Thanks,
Bill
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 12:42 -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
This
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
David correctly pointed out offline that I used the wrong macro to test
for efficient unaligned access. Here's a corrected version, which still
fixes PR65456 without causing regressions. Sorry for the
Hi,
This is a follow-up to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg00103.html, which adds
support for faster unaligned vector memory accesses on POWER8. As
pointed out in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456, there
was a piece missing here. The target macro
11 matches
Mail list logo