Hi Bill,
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 09:41:04PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> PR85080 identifies a test case that started failing last year when
> an improvement was made to the vectorizer. The failure turns out to
> be appropriate. The test used to not expect the loop in the first
> function to be
Hi,
PR85080 identifies a test case that started failing last year when
an improvement was made to the vectorizer. The failure turns out to
be appropriate. The test used to not expect the loop in the first
function to be vectorized, because the cost of potentially unaligned
loads made this
