On 04/09/2014 02:56 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
I have reverted this on trunk and asked Bill to revert this on the 4.8
branch. This patch is too risky to apply this close to a freeze for
4.9.
I received approval off list for an updated variant of the patch for
4.8, so this patch has now been
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 13:39 -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
On 03/25/2014 11:20 AM, Pat Haugen wrote:
Power8 can use lq/stq instructions for TI mode atomic_load/store.
Bootstrap/regtest with no new failures. Ok for trunk and 4.8 (once
bootstrap/regtest finishes)?
-Pat
2014-03-25 Pat
I have reverted this on trunk and asked Bill to revert this on the 4.8
branch. This patch is too risky to apply this close to a freeze for
4.9.
Sorry for the problems.
- David
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Bill Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 13:39 -0500,
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:56 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
I have reverted this on trunk and asked Bill to revert this on the 4.8
branch. This patch is too risky to apply this close to a freeze for
4.9.
I've reverted this on 4.8 as r209254.
Thanks,
Bill
Sorry for the problems.
- David
On 03/25/2014 11:20 AM, Pat Haugen wrote:
Power8 can use lq/stq instructions for TI mode atomic_load/store.
Bootstrap/regtest with no new failures. Ok for trunk and 4.8 (once
bootstrap/regtest finishes)?
-Pat
2014-03-25 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/sync.md (AINT
Power8 can use lq/stq instructions for TI mode atomic_load/store.
Bootstrap/regtest with no new failures. Ok for trunk and 4.8 (once
bootstrap/regtest finishes)?
-Pat
2014-03-25 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/sync.md (AINT mode_iterator): Move definition.
