On 1/23/19 10:31 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> (rs6000_init_hard_regno_mode_ok, direct_move_p): Use
>> HARD_REGISTER_NUM_P.
>
> This line is too long.
Fixed.
> And that is the worst I see in that whole patch! Please apply it.
Committed after a svn update and another self review of
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:12:51AM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> We talked about replacing rs6000'c regno_or_subregno() with the generic
> reg_or_subregno() function from jump.c. I agree the geberic version is
> better because it has an assert that ensures we have a REG. There were
> also a
On 12/12/18 1:58 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Ping.
Ping * 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg00212.html
Peter
Ping.
Peter
On 12/4/18 10:12 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Hi Segher,
>
> We talked about replacing rs6000'c regno_or_subregno() with the generic
> reg_or_subregno() function from jump.c. I agree the geberic version is
> better because it has an assert that ensures we have a REG. There were
>
Hi Segher,
We talked about replacing rs6000'c regno_or_subregno() with the generic
reg_or_subregno() function from jump.c. I agree the geberic version is
better because it has an assert that ensures we have a REG. There were
also a couple of places that could use reg_or_subregno() where we
