On 8/3/16 6:03 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Please open a Bugzilla for the rs6000 backend about the vsx-timode
performance regression. The vsx-timode regression needs to be fixed
for GCC 7.
Ok, I opened https://gcc.gnu.org/PR72804 and will start debugging
the problem.
Peter
On 8/3/16 6:03 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
My question, is since these failures are not due to LRA, do we
want to consider the switch to LRA ok to commit or do we want to
wait until the -mvsx-timode performance bug is
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/2/16 3:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>
>> Now that Vlad has fixed PR69847, which was the last problem holding the
>> rs6000 port from switching from reload to LRA, we are ready to flip the
>> switch.
>>
>> Is the
On 8/2/16 3:17 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
Now that Vlad has fixed PR69847, which was the last problem holding the
rs6000 port from switching from reload to LRA, we are ready to flip the
switch.
Is the following ok once bootstrap/regtesting on both LE and BE
(32 & 64 regtesting) comes out clean?
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:38:10PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 8/2/16 3:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Make
> >>> LRA
> >>> the default for the rs6000 port.
> >
> >Okay.
> >
> >Do we eventually want to remove the
On 8/2/16 3:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Make LRA
the default for the rs6000 port.
Okay.
Do we eventually want to remove the switch?
I think we want to keep it for at least one release, so we can
fall back to reload in
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:17:45PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> Now that Vlad has fixed PR69847, which was the last problem holding the
>> rs6000 port from switching from reload to LRA, we are ready to flip
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:17:45PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Now that Vlad has fixed PR69847, which was the last problem holding the
> rs6000 port from switching from reload to LRA, we are ready to flip the
> switch.
>
> Is the following ok once bootstrap/regtesting on both LE and BE
> (32 &
Now that Vlad has fixed PR69847, which was the last problem holding the
rs6000 port from switching from reload to LRA, we are ready to flip the
switch.
Is the following ok once bootstrap/regtesting on both LE and BE
(32 & 64 regtesting) comes out clean?
Peter
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c