On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/17/15 08:31, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs
On 02/17/15 08:31, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
added a new testcase that tests the non-value
On 9 February 2015 at 05:41, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
added a new testcase that tests the non-value sibcall pattern too.
OK? Bootstrapped and
The problem here is that we get a symbol_ref which is SImode but for
the sibcall patterns we only match symbol_refs which use DImode. I
added a new testcase that tests the non-value sibcall pattern too.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
