Re: [PING v3][PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:48:46PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > > On 01/12/15 20:23, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > >On 25/11/15 12:14, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > >>I would like to ping the patch: > >>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02174.html. > >> > > > >Ping. > > > > Ping. Ok.

[PING v3][PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

On 01/12/15 20:23, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: On 25/11/15 12:14, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: I would like to ping the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02174.html. Ping. Ping. -Maxim

[PING v2][PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

On 25/11/15 12:14, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: I would like to ping the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02174.html. Ping. -Maxim

Re: [PING v2][PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 20:23 +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > On 25/11/15 12:14, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > > I would like to ping the patch: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02174.html. > > > > Ping. Yes, please add :)

[PING][PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

I would like to ping the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02174.html.

[PATCH][4.9] Backport fix for PR sanitizer/64820.

Hi, this small patch fixes the logic in ASan vs SSP interaction to provide correct "size" parameter to asan_stack_malloc_[N] routines. With current logic, we would have assertion failure in libsanitizer in UAR mode on 32-bit targets due to wrong granularity of resulting addr + size address.