On 27/10/16 16:28, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 27/10/16 11:48, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 27/10/16 11:25, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This a simple patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/pr66912.c.
It's a test case only
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/10/16 11:48, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>
>> On 27/10/16 11:25, Renlin Li wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This a simple patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/pr66912.c.
>>> It's a test case only applicable to small
Hi,
On 27/10/16 11:48, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 27/10/16 11:25, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This a simple patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/pr66912.c.
It's a test case only applicable to small memory model which is the default
one.
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ":got(page_lo15)?:n_common" }
On 27/10/16 11:25, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This a simple patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/pr66912.c.
> It's a test case only applicable to small memory model which is the default
> one.
>
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ":got(page_lo15)?:n_common" } } */
i think this is supposed to work
Hi all,
This a simple patch to fix gcc.target/aarch64/pr66912.c.
It's a test case only applicable to small memory model which is the default
one.
It has been tested to run only when the memory model is small.
Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-27 Renlin Li