On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:49:10AM +, Jiong Wang wrote:
> >>>Is this ok for trunk?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Kyrill
> >>>
> >>>2016-10-12 Kyrylo Tkachov
> >>>
> >>>* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_register_saved_on_entry): Add
> >>>function comment.
> >>>(aarch64_next_callee_sav
On 31/10/16 12:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/10/16 12:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00839.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 12/10/16 11:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at the aarch64 prologue and epilogue generation
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/10/16 12:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00839.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 12/10/16 11:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at the aarch64 prologue and epilogue generation code and I noticed
many of the helper
fun
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00839.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 12/10/16 11:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking at the aarch64 prologue and epilogue generation code and I noticed
many of the helper
functions don't have function comments so it makes it harder than it
Hi all,
I'm looking at the aarch64 prologue and epilogue generation code and I noticed
many of the helper
functions don't have function comments so it makes it harder than it has to to
understand what's going on.
This patch adds function comments to some of them. I hope I understood the
functi
