Hi Andrew,
On 20/06/17 06:06, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch we currently generate:
foo:
mov w1, 0
ldaxr w2, [x0]
cmp w2, 3
bne .L2
stxrw3, w1, [x
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the testcase in this patch we currently generate:
> foo:
> mov w1, 0
> ldaxr w2, [x0]
> cmp w2, 3
> bne .L2
> stxrw3, w1, [x0]
> cmp w3, 0
> .L2:
>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:29:50PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the testcase in this patch we currently generate:
> foo:
> mov w1, 0
> ldaxr w2, [x0]
> cmp w2, 3
> bne .L2
> stxrw3, w1, [x0]
> cmp w3, 0
> .L2:
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 08/05/17 11:59, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/04/17 10:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01648.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 28/02/17 12:29, Kyrill T
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/04/17 10:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01648.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 28/02/17 12:29, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch we current
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01648.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 28/02/17 12:29, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch we currently generate:
foo:
mov w1, 0
ldaxr w2, [x0]
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch we currently generate:
foo:
mov w1, 0
ldaxr w2, [x0]
cmp w2, 3
bne .L2
stxrw3, w1, [x0]
cmp w3, 0
.L2:
csetw0, eq
ret
Note that the STXR could have been storing the WZ
