On 6 January 2014 11:52, Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes vector shift by 64 behavior to meet reference
manual expectations. Testcase included to check that expectations
are now met. No regressions found.
Is patch OK?
OK
/Marcus
Hi,
Could someone, please, commit this patch, as I do not have permissions
to do so.
Kind regards,
Alex
On 23/01/14 12:04, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 6 January 2014 11:52, Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes vector shift by 64 behavior to meet reference
manual
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:57:33PM +, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
Could someone, please, commit this patch, as I do not have permissions
to do so.
Please don't top-post on this list.
On 23/01/14 12:04, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 6 January 2014 11:52, Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
On 06/01/14 11:52, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes vector shift by 64 behavior to meet reference
manual expectations. Testcase included to check that expectations
are now met. No regressions found.
Is patch OK?
Thanks,
Alex
2014-01-06 Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
gcc/
Hi,
This patch fixes vector shift by 64 behavior to meet reference
manual expectations. Testcase included to check that expectations
are now met. No regressions found.
Is patch OK?
Thanks,
Alex
2014-01-06 Alex Velenko alex.vele...@arm.com
gcc/
*