Re: [PATCH][ARM][3/3] Implement negsicc, notsicc optabs

2015-09-10 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 01/09/15 16:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > [Resending with patch attached] > > Hi all, > > This third patch implements the new optabs for arm. > Conveniently, we can reuse the recently refactored *if_neg_move pattern > and extend it to cover the conditional NOT case. > Although arm has

[PATCH][ARM][3/3] Implement negsicc, notsicc optabs

2015-09-01 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi all, This third patch implements the new optabs for arm. Conveniently, we can reuse the recently refactored *if_neg_move pattern and extend it to cover the conditional NOT case. Although arm has conditional execution capabilities I have found that performing the transformation from patch 1/3

Re: [PATCH][ARM][3/3] Implement negsicc, notsicc optabs

2015-09-01 Thread pinskia
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > Hi all, > > This third patch implements the new optabs for arm. > Conveniently, we can reuse the recently refactored *if_neg_move pattern > and extend it to cover the conditional NOT case. > Although arm has

[PATCH][ARM][3/3] Implement negsicc, notsicc optabs

2015-09-01 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
[Resending with patch attached] Hi all, This third patch implements the new optabs for arm. Conveniently, we can reuse the recently refactored *if_neg_move pattern and extend it to cover the conditional NOT case. Although arm has conditional execution capabilities I have found that performing