On 05/10/2016 03:28 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
What about (some_class i { 0 }; some_class < ...; some_class++)
and similar syntax?
It's allowed, thanks, I missed this in the initial patch.
The testsuite coverage is insufficient (nothing e.g.
tests templates or #pragma simd).
Patch is updated.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 18:23:23 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 15:58:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:45:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm
> > > says:
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 15:58:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:45:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm
> > says:
> > In C++, the control variable shall be declared and initialized
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:45:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm
> says:
> In C++, the control variable shall be declared and initialized within the
> initialization clause of the _Cilk_for loop. The
Hi!
www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm
says:
In C++, the control variable shall be declared and initialized within the
initialization clause of the _Cilk_for loop. The variable shall have automatic
storage duration. The variable shall
