redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][ARM] Dot Product NEON intrinsics [Patch (3/8)]
>
> On 26 November 2017 at 13:56, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> > On 24 November 2017 at 20:38, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2017 at 19:05, Tamar Christina
>
Hi Christophe,
On 26/11/17 20:01, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 26 November 2017 at 13:56, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
On 24 November 2017 at 20:38, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
On 24 November 2017 at 19:05, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi Christophe,
After your commit, I have these reports:
http://people.li
On 26 November 2017 at 13:56, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 24 November 2017 at 20:38, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>> On 24 November 2017 at 19:05, Tamar Christina
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>
After your commit, I have these reports:
http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross
On 24 November 2017 at 20:38, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> On 24 November 2017 at 19:05, Tamar Christina wrote:
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>>>
>>> After your commit, I have these reports:
>>> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-
>>> validation/gcc/trunk/255064/report-build-info.html
>>>
>>> Aft
On 24 November 2017 at 19:05, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>>
>> After your commit, I have these reports:
>> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-
>> validation/gcc/trunk/255064/report-build-info.html
>>
>> After my commit, I have these reports:
>> http://people.linaro.org/
Hi Christophe,
>
> After your commit, I have these reports:
> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-
> validation/gcc/trunk/255064/report-build-info.html
>
> After my commit, I have these reports:
> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-
> validation/gcc/trunk/255126/report-b
On 24 November 2017 at 11:31, Tamar Christina wrote:
>> >
>> Not sure if Kyrill actually meant to comment about the three lines above, but
>> they have a bug:
>> #if should be before #pragma GCC push_options.
>>
>> Indeed, after this patch was committed (r255064), I've noticed many
>> regressions,
> >
> Not sure if Kyrill actually meant to comment about the three lines above, but
> they have a bug:
> #if should be before #pragma GCC push_options.
>
> Indeed, after this patch was committed (r255064), I've noticed many
> regressions, for instance
> p64_p128 is now unsupported. This is because
Hi Christophe,
On 23/11/17 23:26, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 22 November 2017 at 12:26, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Tamar,
On 06/11/17 16:53, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
This patch adds the NEON intrinsics for Dot product.
Dot product is available from ARMv8.2-a and onwards.
Regtested on
On 22 November 2017 at 12:26, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi Tamar,
>
> On 06/11/17 16:53, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch adds the NEON intrinsics for Dot product.
>>
>> Dot product is available from ARMv8.2-a and onwards.
>>
>> Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
>> a
Hi Tamar,
On 06/11/17 16:53, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi All,
This patch adds the NEON intrinsics for Dot product.
Dot product is available from ARMv8.2-a and onwards.
Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf with no issues found.
Ok for trunk?
gcc
Ping
> -Original Message-
> From: Tamar Christina [mailto:tamar.christ...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 16:54
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: nd ; Ramana Radhakrishnan
> ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; ni...@redhat.com; Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> Subject: [P
Hi All,
This patch adds the NEON intrinsics for Dot product.
Dot product is available from ARMv8.2-a and onwards.
Regtested on arm-none-eabi, armeb-none-eabi,
aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf with no issues found.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/
2017-11-06 Tamar Christina
* config/aarch
13 matches
Mail list logo
