On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
I'm not a good choice to be the maintainer of a perl script.
I'm all kinds of sorry about the original choice of scripting
language. I'd just spend a couple of hours re-writing it in python.
On 05/12/2015 06:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
that this script should be maintained by
On 05/12/2015 10:14 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 06:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
On 05/12/2015 09:19 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 04/30/2015 12:03 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 04/21/2015 02:26 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi all,
Contrib/mklog is currently faked by preprocessor directives inside
functions to produce invalid ChangeLog. The attached patch fixes this.
Tested with my
On 04/30/2015 12:03 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 04/21/2015 02:26 PM, Yury Gribov wrote:
Hi all,
Contrib/mklog is currently faked by preprocessor directives inside
functions to produce invalid ChangeLog. The attached patch fixes this.
Tested with my local mklog testsuite and
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it
the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new
maintainer for it.
Diegop.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:19
On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it
the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new
maintainer for
On 12-05-15 17:33, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it
the most. It's a simple script, so it
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
The patch looks fine to me.
I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest
that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it
the most. It's a
