On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:59, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I simply put it in place as a possibility, I currently don't plan
> to implement any GF_KIND_COMPLEX folders (the caller would need to
> re-gimplify them which doesn't sound too useful). Maybe I should
> simply drop it.
Perhaps. Not supp
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 10:11 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > This tries to extend the previously posted CCP folding patch by
> > introducing a generic interface for non-tree-building, GIMPLE SSA
> > aware folding. The low-level interface for folding regular
On 03/18/2011 10:11 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This tries to extend the previously posted CCP folding patch by
introducing a generic interface for non-tree-building, GIMPLE SSA
aware folding. The low-level interface for folding regular
operations is
/* Fold the expression composed by *CODEP,
This tries to extend the previously posted CCP folding patch by
introducing a generic interface for non-tree-building, GIMPLE SSA
aware folding. The low-level interface for folding regular
operations is
/* Fold the expression composed by *CODEP, TYPE and valueized operands
*OP0P,
*OP1P and *