Re: [PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit separate SET insn in IF-ELSE case

On 11/03/2015 02:09 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi Jeff, On 02/11/15 22:46, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/27/2015 08:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This patch fixes the gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c test for x86_64 where we were failing to if-convert. This was because in my patch at

Re: [PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit separate SET insn in IF-ELSE case

Hi Jeff, On 02/11/15 22:46, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/27/2015 08:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This patch fixes the gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c test for x86_64 where we were failing to if-convert. This was because in my patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=228194 which tried to emit

Re: [PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit separate SET insn in IF-ELSE case

On 10/27/2015 08:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This patch fixes the gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c test for x86_64 where we were failing to if-convert. This was because in my patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=228194 which tried to emit a SET to move the source of insn_a or insn_b

[PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/67749: Do not emit separate SET insn in IF-ELSE case

Hi all, This patch fixes the gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c test for x86_64 where we were failing to if-convert. This was because in my patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=228194 which tried to emit a SET to move the source of insn_a or insn_b (that came from the test block) into a