Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:25, Mike Stump wrote:
On May 18, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Simulators such as qemu report the presence of fork (it's in glibc) but
generally do not support synchronization primitives between threads, so any
tests using fork are unreli
On 18 May 2015 at 20:25, Mike Stump wrote:
> On May 18, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>> Simulators such as qemu report the presence of fork (it's in glibc) but
>> generally do not support synchronization primitives between threads, so any
>> tests using fork are unreliable.
>
> Hum, I
On May 18, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> Simulators such as qemu report the presence of fork (it's in glibc) but
> generally do not support synchronization primitives between threads, so any
> tests using fork are unreliable.
Hum, I have a simulator (binutils/sim) that has fork. All
Simulators such as qemu report the presence of fork (it's in glibc) but
generally do not support synchronization primitives between threads, so any
tests using fork are unreliable. This patch disables the subset of such tests
that identify themselves using dg-require-fork.
At present, such tes
