On 18/07/15 17:02, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:47:34PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I mean move the whole if (BINARY_P ... block to after the existing
simplify calls, to just before the First see if we can apply comment,
and not do a new simplify_rtx call at all. Does that
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:47:34PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I mean move the whole if (BINARY_P ... block to after the existing
simplify calls, to just before the First see if we can apply comment,
and not do a new simplify_rtx call at all. Does that work?
Yes, and here's the patch.
It just
On 16/07/15 19:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
If you always want to simplify first, does it work to move this whole big
block behind the simplify just following it? Or do you want to simplify
after the transform as well?
You mean
On Jul 17, 2015, at 7:36 PM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 16/07/15 19:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
If you always want to simplify first, does it work to move this whole big
block behind the simplify
On 07/17/2015 05:36 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/07/15 19:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
If you always want to simplify first, does it work to move this
whole big
block behind the simplify just following it? Or do you want to
On 16/07/15 19:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
If you always want to simplify first, does it work to move this whole big
block behind the simplify just following it? Or do you want to simplify
after the transform as well?
You mean
Hi all,
This is an attempt to solve the problem in the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01010.html
in a generic way after some pointers from Segher and Andrew.
The problem I got was that combine_simplify_rtx was trying to
do some special handling of unary
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:25:14PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This is an attempt to solve the problem in the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01010.html
in a generic way after some pointers from Segher and Andrew.
The problem I got was that
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:17:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
If you always want to simplify first, does it work to move this whole big
block behind the simplify just following it? Or do you want to simplify
after the transform as well?
You mean move this hunk outside the if (BINARY_P
On 16/07/15 19:13, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:25:14PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This is an attempt to solve the problem in the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01010.html
in a generic way after some pointers from Segher and
10 matches
Mail list logo
