Hi Martin,
On 20.09.22 14:24, Martin Liška wrote:
On 9/20/22 14:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Instead of removing the links, can we rather replace it by an updated link?
[...]
Thanks for the archeological work you did.
Sure, what about the suggested patch?
LGTM. Thanks!
Tobias
On 9/20/22 14:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 20.09.22 14:02, Martin Liška wrote:
>> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
>> @@ -455,9 +455,7 @@ version 2.6, @uref{https://www.openacc.org/}). See
>> The Fortran 95 standard specifies in Part 2 (ISO/IEC
Hi Martin,
On 20.09.22 14:02, Martin Liška wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
@@ -455,9 +455,7 @@ version 2.6, @uref{https://www.openacc.org/}). See
The Fortran 95 standard specifies in Part 2 (ISO/IEC 1539-2:2000)
varying length character strings.
PR fortran/106636
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.texi: Remove 2 dead links.
---
gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi b/gcc/fortran/gfortran.texi
index 59d673bfc03..25410e6088d 100644
---
