On 28/05/16 21:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to
documentation of various backends that GCC supports. The info on arm
seems a bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and there is no
Hi Gerald,
On 28/05/16 21:04, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to
documentation of various backends that GCC supports. The info on arm
seems a bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and
Hi Kyrill,
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to
> documentation of various backends that GCC supports. The info on arm
> seems a bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and there is no entry
> for aarch64. This patch
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 04:27:31PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to
> documentation of various backends that GCC supports. The info on arm seems a
> bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and there is no entry for
Hi all,
I noticed that we have a readings.html page that has pointers to documentation
of various backends that GCC supports.
The info on arm seems a bit out of date and somewhat confusing, and there is no
entry for aarch64.
This patch tries to address that.
The arm entry is updated to not
